VDM/BLORD
The criminal case involving cryptocurrency entrepreneur Linus Ifejirika, popularly known as Blord, and social media activist Martins Otse was stalled on Monday after the presiding judge recused herself from the matter.
The case, which came up before the Federal High Court in Abuja, has now been adjourned to May 19, 2026, for mention pending reassignment.
Both parties appeared before Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia for continuation of proceedings, coming shortly after Blord was granted bail on self-recognition and released from the Kuje Correctional Centre.
However, in an unexpected development, the judge announced her decision to withdraw from the case on her own motion, without any formal application from either the prosecution or defence.
She subsequently directed that the case file be forwarded to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for reassignment to another judge.
Reason for Recusal
According to proceedings, the judge’s decision was taken to preserve public confidence in the judiciary amid heightened public commentary, criticism, and social media reactions surrounding the case.
Legal observers say judicial recusal is generally considered where there is concern that continued handling of a matter could raise questions about impartiality or confidence in the legal process.
Speaking after the sitting, lawyer Chikezie Elijah described the development as unusual, noting that no formal request had been made by either party for the judge to step aside.
He said the decision came as a surprise, adding that such action is typically taken where the integrity of the judicial process may be subject to scrutiny.
Nature of the Case
The matter was instituted by the Nigeria Police Force and involves allegations of criminal conspiracy, impersonation, and unauthorised use of VeryDarkMan’s identity.
Blord had earlier been remanded at Kuje Correctional Centre before later securing bail.
At Monday’s sitting, all parties were said to be prepared to proceed with trial before the judge’s withdrawal brought proceedings to a halt.
Public Interest and Courtroom Developments
The case has attracted widespread public attention due to the prominence of the individuals involved and the intense debate it has generated across social media platforms.
Human rights activist Omoyele Sowore was also present in court. Sowore had previously criticised Blord’s remand and publicly vowed to secure his release, while alleging procedural irregularities.
His intervention had earlier sparked a public disagreement with VeryDarkMan.
In a notable moment inside the court premises, Blord and VeryDarkMan were seen exchanging pleasantries and shaking hands in the presence of their legal representatives before departing the venue.
Next Steps
With the recusal now confirmed, the case will await reassignment by the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court.
Proceedings are expected to resume on May 19, 2026, when the matter comes up for mention before a newly assigned judge.
Legal analysts say the reassignment may help ease tensions surrounding the case while allowing the trial to continue under a fresh judicial process.
