
For decades, discussions about insecurity in Northern Nigeria have focused largely on armed groups operating in forests, highways, and remote communities. Public debate has often centered on military operations, policing, intelligence gathering, and the need for stronger border controls.
However, emerging research suggests that the roots of violence may begin much earlier and much closer to home.
A new study examining low-income Hausa-Fulani communities across the three senatorial districts of Kaduna State argues that organised violence often starts during childhood, long before young people are recruited into gangs, bandit groups, or extremist networks.
According to the findings, insecurity in Northern Nigeria may be linked not only to poverty and weak institutions, but also to the breakdown of family support systems, early childhood neglect, and the limited ability of mothers to guide vulnerable children under difficult social and economic conditions.
Home as the First Institution of Peace
The study emphasizes that the home remains the first institution where values, discipline, empathy, and identity are formed.
Within many households, mothers play a central role in early emotional care, moral guidance, and character development. Through daily interaction, supervision, affection, and correction, they often shape how children understand right and wrong.
Researchers argue that when mothers are supported to carry out this role effectively, families can become powerful barriers against future violence.
But when that support is missing, the consequences can be severe.
The study notes that communities may ultimately pay the price in the form of:
- Lost childhood opportunities
- Damaged identities
- Family breakdown
- Youth delinquency
- Community instability
- Recruitment into violent groups
In this context, the report suggests that no amount of security spending can fully replace the preventive value of healthy early childhood development.
Violence Often Begins Before Recruitment
One of the study’s key conclusions is that organised violence rarely begins at the moment a child joins an armed group.
Instead, the process often unfolds gradually over several years.
Fieldwork across low-income Hausa-Fulani communities in Kaduna State found troubling developmental patterns:
Around age seven, some children begin showing signs of neglect and early behavioral problems
- By age nine, many boys may already be exposed to petty crime or substance abuse
- By adolescence, violent peer groups can become their main source of identity and belonging
This progression suggests that by the time security agencies notice a young person’s involvement in crime or militancy, the foundations may already have been laid years earlier.
Interviews With Reformed and Incarcerated Youth
Researchers interviewed young men involved in:
- Street gangsterism
- Banditry
- Terrorism
- Violent community conflicts
- Other forms of organised crime
Many were either incarcerated or had undergone rehabilitation.
Despite their different paths, many described a similar life pattern:
Childhood neglect → Early deviance → Delinquency → Substance abuse → Recruitment into violent groups
Researchers said each stage often built upon the one before it.
Most strikingly, many participants did not initially describe themselves as driven by ideology, politics, or even economic desperation.
Instead, they spoke first about emotional experiences such as:
- Anger
- Frustration
- Deprivation
- Rejection
- Neglect
- Desire for recognition
According to the study, violent groups later exploited these emotional wounds.
Why Violent Groups Become Attractive
The report found that many youths were drawn into violent networks because those groups offered what their early family environments failed to provide.
This included:
Identity
Young people who lacked a sense of personal worth often found meaning in group membership.
Protection
Those raised in unstable environments sometimes saw violent groups as a source of security.
Belonging
Gang or militant networks often replaced absent family bonds.
Purpose
For many disillusioned youths, violence appeared to offer direction, status, and power.
This helps explain why military force alone may struggle to solve the problem.
Even when groups are dismantled, new recruits may continue to emerge unless the emotional and social drivers are addressed.
Communities Believe in Mothers’ Influence But Outcomes Remain Weak
The study found a major contradiction within many communities.
People overwhelmingly believed that mothers play an important role in preventing youth violence. Yet actual success rates in intervention were reportedly low.
Why does a widely accepted belief fail to produce stronger outcomes?
Researchers identified three major barriers limiting what mothers can realistically do.
1. Authority Deficit in Patriarchal Settings
In many conservative patriarchal communities, a mother’s authority over children often depends heavily on support from her husband or male relatives.
Where fathers are absent due to:
- Death
- Divorce
- Labour migration
- Emotional disengagement
- Family separation
…mothers may struggle to enforce discipline, especially over sons entering adolescence.
Some boys reportedly reject maternal authority outright and instead seek identity from deviant peer groups.
These peer circles may then become substitute “masculine communities,” promoting defiance, aggression, and criminal behavior.
The study also noted that where a young boy becomes a breadwinner early in life, family power dynamics can reverse.
Once a child begins financially supporting the household, the mother may lose moral leverage to question or correct him.
2. Poverty Creates Impossible Choices
Economic hardship was identified as another major factor.
Many mothers in low-income communities are forced to combine multiple roles:
- Income earner
- Caregiver
- Household manager
- Emotional support provider
- Moral guide
Long hours spent working to feed the family often leave little time for:
- Supervision
- Emotional connection
- Monitoring friendships
- School follow-up
- Moral instruction
As a result, children may seek support and validation elsewhere.
The study warns that poverty does not only deprive families financially it also steals time, attention, and emotional presence.
3. Collapse of Collective Motherhood
Traditionally, child-rearing in many Northern Nigerian communities was communal.
Children were watched and corrected not only by parents, but also by:
- Neighbours
- Aunts
- Grandmothers
- Elder women
- Community leaders
This informal network created multiple layers of accountability and care.
However, researchers say that system has weakened significantly due to urban migration, economic strain, social fragmentation, and declining trust.
Today, many mothers reportedly raise children in near-total isolation, without the support systems earlier generations relied upon.
That means when a child begins drifting toward delinquency, fewer adults are present to notice and intervene early.
Mothers Are Not Passive Victims
A key message of the study is that mothers in these communities are not passive or indifferent.
Rather, many are struggling under enormous pressure.
They are confronting:
- Poverty
Weak family structures - Gender norms limiting authority
- Loss of community support
- Rising insecurity
- Emotional stress
When they fail to prevent sons from joining violent groups, researchers argue it is rarely because of lack of love or concern.
More often, it is because they lack the tools, authority, and support needed to succeed.
What This Means for Security Policy
The findings suggest that Northern Nigeria’s insecurity crisis cannot be solved by military responses alone.
Security strategies may need to include stronger family and community prevention systems.
Possible interventions include:
Parenting Support Programs
Training parents on child supervision, emotional development, and conflict prevention.
Economic Support for Vulnerable Families
Cash transfers, food support, and women-focused livelihoods could reduce pressures that undermine caregiving.
Male Responsibility Campaigns
Encouraging fathers to remain present and engaged in child development.
Youth Mentorship Systems
Trusted mentors can provide identity and guidance for at-risk boys.
Rebuilding Community Networks
Neighbourhood women’s groups, faith leaders, and local elders can help restore informal child protection systems.
Early Intervention in Schools
Teachers and counselors can identify warning signs before children are drawn into crime.
A Broader Lesson for Nigeria
Although the research focused on Kaduna State, the lessons may apply across many parts of Nigeria facing youth violence, cultism, gang crime, and recruitment into armed groups.
Wherever children grow up with neglect, emotional isolation, weak supervision, and lack of opportunity, insecurity can take root.


